The New York Daily News has a pretty objective breakdown (a FAQ, if you will) on last week’s court ruling centered around 2003 drug test.
Q:Was the ruling a surprise?
A:Not exactly. It upheld previous rulings by other federal judges, and the bulk of the opinion’s reasoning was a reiteration of established legal precedents, especially concerning probable cause and other protections of the Fourth Amendment.
Maybe a bit dry reading for those who just want to skip to part where hang those taking PEDs but *I* found the article interesting.